Main menu:


 

Directory

Archives


 

Site search

Feeds etc

“But what if nobody takes notice?”

By Alastair Crooke, Conflicts Forum, May 11, 2008

“But what if nobody takes notice?” is the question posed by Robert Malley and Hussein Agha in an article in the recent New York Review of Books concerning the putative ‘shelf agreement’ being discussed between President Abbas and Prime Minister Olmert. A ‘shelf agreement’ is an exercise in outlining some principles for the settlement of the Palestinian issue, rather than to attempt a full solution. It is a document, the culmination of the Annapolis process, intended not for implementation; but rather immediately to be set aside — on the ‘shelf’ — whilst all parties, Bush, Abbas and Olmert declare the document to represent a huge triumph — whilst shamelessly waving this Chamberlinesque ‘peace in out time’ paper before their electorates in order to ‘help’ in their respective elections, or to cement legacies.

Israel is expected to go to parliamentary elections shortly — whether or not Olmert survives the threat of a criminal indictment hanging over him. Olmert’s strategy has been to persuade Israelis that the ‘agreement’ is somehow an achievement. And in one limited sense, it may be seen by Israel to be an ‘achievement’. But not in bringing any change on the ground: the Occupation and the grinding life of Palestinians will continue as before. Indeed almost all Israelis and Palestinians understand that the much fêted ‘shelf agreement’ will be inoperable — neither Olmert nor Abbas can implement it, even if they wished so to do. Continue reading… »

Carter meeting sparks new debate over engaging Hamas

Mark Perry (Conflicts Forum) and Robert Satloff (Washington Institute for Near East Policy), NewsHour, PBS, April 18, 2008

Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter met Friday with leaders from Hamas, a militant group labeled a terrorist organization by the U.S. and Israel. The meeting sparked renewed debate over whether any negotiations should include the Palestinian group. This NewsHour analysis by Mark Perry and Robert Satloff was presented by Margaret Warner.

MARGARET WARNER: Former President Jimmy Carter’s unofficial Mideast peace mission this week has taken him to Egypt, Israel and Saudi Arabia. But the most controversial stop by far was his meeting today in Syria with Khaled Mashal, the exiled political leader of the Palestinian organization Hamas.

Hamas, labeled by the U.S. as a terrorist organization, currently controls the Palestinian Gaza Strip. But the U.S. and Israel talk only to the Palestinian Authority, which controls the West Bank.

Jimmy Carter has said no peace agreement can be reached without talking to Hamas.

For two views on the Carter talks, we turn to Robert Satloff, executive director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy; and Mark Perry, an author and journalist who is now co-director of the Conflicts Forum. It’s a British-American organization promoting engagement between the West and political Islam. Continue reading… »

From Mitchell to Annapolis and Beyond: Thoughts on the American Role in Palestinian-Israeli Peacemaking

Remarks of Frederic C. Hof, The Palestine Center of the Jerusalem Fund, March 20, 2008

Fred Hof, a keen Middle East observer and former member of the Sharm el-Sheikh Fact-Finding Committee, presented a paper on the current Israeli-Palestinian situation, “From Mitchell to Annapolis and Beyond: Thoughts on the American Role in Palestinian-Israeli Peacemaking” at the Palestine Center on March 20. A transcript of the insights of Mr. Hof, a good friend of Conflicts Forum, are reproduced here for the benefit of our readers.

From Mitchell to Annapolis and Beyond: Thoughts on the American Role in Palestinian-Israeli Peacemaking [PDF]Cancer insurance policy
Credit score charts
Hsbc credit card redemption
Canada student loan
Great lakes student loans
Credit card reward trends
Excell credit card application
Debt consolidation loan online
Insurance sexual health clinics
Credit card debt cancellation
Travelers auto insurance
Consumer credit report
Reporting credit card
Mortgage calculator home loan refinance
Credit report .com
Airline credit card offer
Credit score points
Credit report self help repair
House refinance
Transunion credit reports
California debt consolidation refinance bad credit home loan
Credit report agencies
Debt negotiation and settlement
Unsecured debt consolidation
Credit repair loan
Cash international loan payday service
Credit card software accept
New jersey disability insurance
Health insurance self employed
Compare auto insurance
Payday advance loan oregon
Absolutely free credit report
Georgia free credit report
Credit report monitoring
Credit score definition
Free credit report services
Credit report online
Good credit rating score
Bank credit card offers
Bank mortgage rates refinance mortgage loan home rate
Same day payday loan
Wells fargo home mortgage current refinance interest rates
Liberty mutual homeowners insurance
Savings account payday loan
California refinance home improvement loans mortgage
Faxless online payday loan
Credit repair attorney
Best credit card deal
Refinance debt consolidation
Federal credit reporting
Homeowner insurance quote
Chase continental credit card
Payday loan uk
Reporting bad credit
Bad credit scores
Credit card debt information
Credit rating score scale
Aig auto insurance
No credit check student loans
Lexinton law credit repair
Credit report questions
Settlement and debt negotiation
Log home insurance
College debt consolidation
Renter insurance quote
Life insurance quotes accidental death
Credit report fraud
Construction loans for homes
Low cost auto insurance
Life insurance settlement
Term life insurance child
Best credit reporting
Credit score values
Credit cards online application
Free credit report
Online homeowners insurance quotes
Used auto loan

The naive armchair warriors are fighting a delusional war

By Alastair Crooke, The Guardian, March 24, 2008

The French philosopher Michel Foucault notes that in all societies discourse is controlled - imperceptibly constrained, perhaps, but constrained nonetheless. We are not free to say exactly what we like. The norms set by institutions, convention and our need to keep within the boundaries of accepted behaviour and thought limit what may be touched upon. The Archbishop of Canterbury experienced the backlash from stepping outside these conventions when he spoke about aspects of Islamic law that might be imported into British life.

Once, a man was held to be mad if he strayed from this discourse - even if his utterings were credited with revealing some hidden truth. Today, he is called “naive”, or accused of having gone “native”. Recently, the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) marshalled former senior military and intelligence experts in order to assert such limits to expression by warning us that “deference” to multiculturalism was undermining the fight against Islamic “extremism” and threatening security.

Former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger, in a recent interview with a German magazine, embellished Rusi’s complaints of naivety and “flabby thinking”. Radical Islam won’t stop, he warned, and the “virus” would only become more virulent if the US were to withdraw from Iraq. Continue reading… »

The Middle East Peace Process: the case for jaw-jaw not war-war

By Michael Ancram, Accord (Issue 19), Conciliation Resources, 2008

When I opened talks with Sinn Féin/Irish Republican Army (IRA), such was the anger of the Ulster Unionists that they declared me ‘contaminated’ and withdrew from talks with me. Yet as a direct result of those initial communications in the early 1990s we now have the makings of a peaceful and prosperous future for that historically troubled province. In Churchill’s terms, after thirty years jaw-jaw has proved better than war-war.

Let me be clear: I do not like terrorists and I despise their activities. However, while you do not have to like your enemy, it helps to respect him and dialogue is part of that respect. The Northern Ireland experience holds some lessons for the Middle East, particularly as the process we developed in pursuit of peace had largely to be constructed as I went along. No conflict is the same as another, but there are similarities from which it is instructive to learn. Continue reading… »

Arrest of Khaled Hamza Salam

By Ibrahim El Houdaiby, Conflicts Forum, March 4, 2008

khaled-hamza-salam.jpgI woke up on Wednesday February 20th on the news of the arrest of Khaled Hamza Salam, IkhwanWeb.com co-editor in chief. I was on a short visit to Egypt and had met Hamza on Tuesday night, where we went over several contentious issues including the ongoing military tribunal for leaders of the country’s largest opposition group, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), and the continuous deterioration of human rights status in Egypt.

Many people know Hamza through his writings, others know him as a very strong human rights activist, but his contributions to reform in Egypt go way beyond that. He is one of the founders of ikhwanweb.com, the MB’s official English website, and a proprietor of its mission of building bridges of mutual understanding and respect with the world. Within the Brotherhood, he is known to be a strong advocate of dialogue and openness. Continue reading… »